The Essence of "Afflictions Are None Other Than Awakening" and the Path of Universal Liberation in the Rishukyō
The Rishukyō (Skt. Adhyardhaśatikā Prajñāpāramitā, "The Guiding Principle of Wisdom Sūtra" in 150 lines, translated into Chinese by Amoghavajra) is the most treasured daily liturgical scripture in Shingon and East Asian Esoteric Buddhism (Mikkyō), chanted sonorously at morning and evening services as well as memorial and votive rites. Its most striking hallmark is its bold declaration that human passion, desire, and sensory experience—so often treated in exoteric Buddhism as defilements to be suppressed or eradicated—are "innately pure in their fundamental nature, constituting the very stage of a Bodhisattva" (the Seventeen Pure Phrases, Jūshichi Seijōku).
Rather than condemning desire as evil and attempting to extinguish life's vitality, Esoteric Buddhism transmutes it—through unstained, non-clinging wisdom (asakti / fuzen)—into the boundless compassionate energy that brings awakening and peace to all beings (Great Desire, Daiyoku, and Great Bliss, Dairaku). Herein lies the supreme esoteric truth of Bonnō-soku-Bodai: "Afflictions are none other than Awakening."
[Historical Episode: Kūkai and Saichō — Their Parting Over the Rishushaku Commentary and the Gravity of Esoteric Transmission]
This Rishukyō was brought from Tang-dynasty China to Japan in the early Heian period by Kōbō Daishi Kūkai (774–835) as one of the crown jewels of Esoteric Buddhism.
At the time, Saichō (767–822), founder of the Japanese Tendai school, maintained an earnest exchange with Kūkai in order to absorb the esoteric teachings. Seeking to decipher the profound doctrines concealed within the Rishukyō, Saichō earnestly requested to borrow Kūkai's esoteric commentary, Amoghavajra's Rishushaku (Commentary on the Guiding Principle of Wisdom Sūtra).
Kūkai, however, firmly declined the request. In Esoteric Buddhism, ultimate truth is never something to be grasped merely through intellectual reading of written texts (exoteric conceptual interpretation); it must be embodied directly through authentic master-to-disciple initiation (Abhiṣeka / Kanjō) and the lived contemplative practice of the Three Mysteries of body, speech, and mind (Sanmitsu Kaji). Moreover, Kūkai recognized the grave danger that reading the literal surface of its radical "affirmation of desire" without esoteric initiation would invite fatal misunderstanding and distortion.
Precisely over this refusal to lend the Rishushaku, the two towering giants of Japanese Buddhism—Kūkai and Saichō—parted ways forever. This historic episode vividly testifies to how strictly the Rishukyō was guarded as a sacred esoteric transmission (Hihō) admitting no facile conceptual reduction.